Reported July 2026
Omnissaarray

Rotate Array Right

Reported by candidates from Omnissa's online assessment. Pattern, common pitfall, and the honest play if you blank under the timer.

Get StealthCoderRuns invisibly during the live Omnissa OA. Under 2s to a working solution.
Founder's read

The whole Omnissa question hinges on one thing: a plain array and how you reindex it. Omnissa candidates reported this one in July 2026, and it's Rotate Array Right. Shift nums right by k steps and return the result. The report says it came in a rapid-fire three-problem round where you show brute force, an improved version, and the optimal one, with working code for each. It's easy to solve and easy to fumble under a clock. If you freeze mid-OA, StealthCoder runs invisibly on your desktop and hands you the solution, so a blank doesn't sink you.

The problem

A quick note: this problem is backed by a real Omnissa onsite interview report that directly named rotating an array right by k steps. The report did not include an exact function interface, examples, constraints, or behavior for large k. The core task match is about 95%.
You are given an integer array nums and an integer k. Rotate the array to the right by k steps and return the rotated array.
Interview Follow-up
This was part of a rapid-fire three-problem round in which the candidate presented brute-force, improved, and optimal approaches and wrote working code for each problem.

Function
rotateRight(nums: int[], k: int) → int[]

Examples
Example 1
nums = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
k = 3
return = [5,6,7,1,2,3,4]
Moving the last three values to the front gives [5,6,7,1,2,3,4].
Example 2
nums = [-1,-100,3,99]
k = 2
return = [3,99,-1,-100]
After two right rotations, 3 and 99 move to the front.

Reported by candidates. Source: FastPrep

Pattern and pitfall

The data structure is just the array, and the trick is index math. Brute force shifts the array right by one, k times, which costs O(n*k). Better: copy into a new array and place each value at (i + k) % n, which is O(n) time and O(n) space. Optimal is three reversals in place: reverse the whole array, reverse the first k elements, then reverse the rest. That gives O(n) time and O(1) space. The pitfall is k. The report doesn't say how large k can get, so always do k = k % n first. Skip that and you get wrong answers or index errors when k exceeds the length. Also handle an empty array before taking the modulus, or you divide by zero. Walk through Example 1 by hand before you submit. If the live OA throws you off, StealthCoder is the backup that reads the screen and gives you the reversal code.

Memorize the pattern. If you can't, run StealthCoder. The proctor sees the IDE. They don't see what's behind it.

If this hits your live OA

You can drill Rotate Array Right cold, or you can hedge it. StealthCoder runs invisibly during screen share and surfaces a working solution in under 2 seconds. The proctor sees the IDE. They don't see what's behind it. Made by an engineer who treats the OA as theater. If yours is tonight, you don't have time to grind. You have time to hedge.

Get StealthCoder

Related leaked OAs

⏵ Practice the LeetCode equivalent

This OA pattern shows up on LeetCode as rotate array. If you have time before the OA, drill that.

⏵ The honest play

You've seen the question. Make sure you actually pass Omnissa's OA.

Omnissa reuses patterns across OAs. Made by an engineer who treats the OA as theater. If yours is tonight, you don't have time to grind. You have time to hedge. Works on HackerRank, CodeSignal, CoderPad, and Karat.

Rotate Array Right FAQ

What's the trick in Rotate Array Right?+

Reduce k with k % n, then use index math. The extra-array method puts nums[i] at (i + k) % n. The in-place method reverses the whole array, then the first k elements, then the remaining n-k. Both are linear time.

How hard is this one really?+

Easy on paper. The risk is the format Omnissa reported: three approaches (brute force, improved, optimal) in a rapid-fire round, each with working code. The algorithm isn't hard. Staying calm and fast across all three is the real test.

What should I do about large k?+

The report didn't specify behavior for large k, so assume it can exceed the array length. Compute k = k % n first. If n is 0, return the array immediately. That one line prevents most wrong answers and runtime errors on this problem.

Should I write the O(1) space version?+

Yes, if you can. Show the brute force, then the extra-array version, then the three-reversal approach. Omnissa's reported round asked for all three levels. If time is short, a correct O(n) space solution beats a buggy in-place one.

How do I prepare in 48 hours?+

Write the three-reversal rotation from memory twice, then test it on both examples: [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] with k=3 and [-1,-100,3,99] with k=2. Add edge cases: k=0, k equal to n, k larger than n, and a single element.

Problem reported by candidates from a real Online Assessment. Sourced from a publicly-available candidate-aggregated repository. Not affiliated with Omnissa.

OA at Omnissa?
Invisible during screen share
Get it